Home » News » Industry News » Incoloy 825 vs Hastelloy C276 For Sour Gas Service

Incoloy 825 vs Hastelloy C276 For Sour Gas Service

Views: 2     Author: Monica     Publish Time: 2026-06-04      Origin: Site

twitter sharing button
wechat sharing button
whatsapp sharing button
linkedin sharing button
pinterest sharing button
facebook sharing button
sharethis sharing button

Incoloy 825 and Hastelloy C276 are both NACE MR0175-approved for sour service, but they serve different severity tiers. 825 handles moderate sour conditions at ~55–65% of C276's cost. C276 is required for the most aggressive sour environments. The selection hinges on H₂S partial pressure, chloride concentration, temperature, and the presence of elemental sulfur.

Parameter

Incoloy 825

Hastelloy C276

Winner

UNS No.

N08825

N10276

Ni Content (%)

38–46

54–57

C276 ★

Mo Content (%)

2.5–3.5

15–17

C276 ★

PREN (Pitting Resistance)

~35–40

~70–75

C276 ★

H₂S Resistance (severe)

Moderate

Excellent

C276 ★

NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156

Table A.1 (limited)

Table A.14 (broad)

C276 ★

Yield Strength (min)

241 MPa (35 ksi)

283 MPa (41 ksi)

C276 ★

Weldability

Good (ERNiCrMo-3)

Excellent (ERNiCrMo-4)

Tie

Cost (relative $/kg)

~$35–55/kg

~$75–110/kg

825 ★

Availability (plate/pipe/bar)

Wide — global stock

Good — major mills

825 ★

Primary Application

Mild–moderate sour; acid gas processing

Severe sour; HPHT wells; FGD

Depends on severity

Incoloy 825 vs Hastelloy C276 For Sour Gas Service.webp

Chemical Composition

Every performance difference between 825 and C276 traces back to their chemistry. The most important element is molybdenum (Mo) — the gatekeeper of pitting and crevice corrosion resistance in chloride-rich environments.

Element

Incoloy 825 (N08825)

Hastelloy C276 (N10276)

Significance

Nickel (Ni), %

38–46

Balance (~57)

Base element; primary anti-SSC barrier

Chromium (Cr), %

19.5–23.5

14.5–16.5

Passive film formation; oxidising acid resistance

Molybdenum (Mo), %

2.5–3.5

15–17

★ Key differentiator: pitting & crevice resistance

Iron (Fe), %

22 (balance)

4–7

Cost reduction in 825; low in C276 for corrosion resistance

Tungsten (W), %

3–4.5

Synergistic with Mo; enhances reducing acid resistance

Copper (Cu), %

1.5–3.0

Reduces corrosion rate in non-oxidising acids (H₂SO₄, H₃PO₄)

Titanium (Ti), %

0.6–1.2

Prevents sensitisation (intergranular corrosion) in 825

Carbon (C), % max

0.05

0.01

C276 low C prevents carbide precipitation during welding

Cobalt (Co), % max

2.5

Solid-solution strengthening

Source: ASTM B424 (Incoloy 825 plate/sheet), ASTM B622 (C276 pipe), Special Metals SMC-008, Haynes International H-2002C (2024 revision).

Why Molybdenum Is the Critical Variable

Molybdenum content is the single biggest predictor of resistance to pitting and crevice corrosion in chloride environments. A useful shorthand formula is the Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PREN):

PREN = %Cr + 3.3×%Mo + 16×%N

Incoloy 825 yields a PREN of approximately 35–40. Hastelloy C276, with its dramatically higher Mo content (15–17%), delivers a PREN of approximately 70–75. A PREN above 40 is considered the threshold for reliable service in seawater-level chloride environments (>19,000 ppm Cl⁻). For produced water in deep sour wells, PREN > 60 is frequently required.

 

Mechanical Properties

Both alloys are fully austenitic (face-centered cubic crystal structure) and are strengthened by solid-solution mechanisms rather than precipitation hardening. This gives them excellent ductility and toughness — key properties for oilfield tubulars and fittings that must survive installation loads and pressure cycles without brittle failure.

Property

Incoloy 825

Hastelloy C276

Notes

Min. Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

241 MPa (35 ksi)

283 MPa (41 ksi)

C276 ~17% stronger; advantage in HPHT

Min. Tensile Strength

586 MPa (85 ksi)

690 MPa (100 ksi)

C276 has higher load-bearing capacity

Min. Elongation (% in 2 in)

30%

40%

Both highly ductile; C276 slightly better

Typical Hardness (Rockwell B)

~85 HRB

~90 HRB

Both meet NACE MR0175 hardness limits

Max Hardness (NACE MR0175)

≤ HRC 35

≤ HRC 40

C276 has a higher permitted hardness ceiling

Elastic Modulus

196 GPa

205 GPa

Similar; both are austenitic CRAs

ASME Allowable Stress (at 100°C)

~138 MPa

~172 MPa

C276 permits thinner-wall design

Source: ASTM B424/B619 min. properties; ASME Section II Part D (2023); Haynes International H-2002C; Special Metals SMC-008.

Corrosion Resistance in Sour Gas Environments

Corrosion Resistance in Sour Gas Environments.webp

NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156 Compliance

NACE MR0175 (internationally adopted as ISO 15156) is the governing standard for metallic materials used in oil and gas production in the presence of H₂S. Part 3 of the standard provides three data tables defining the conditions under which specific CRAs are qualified:

• Table A.1 (ISO 15156-3): Covers austenitic alloys including Incoloy 825, but imposes hardness limits (≤ HRC 35) and restricts use to moderate H₂S partial pressures.

• Table A.14 (ISO 15156-3): Covers high-alloy CRAs including Hastelloy C276, with significantly broader H₂S partial pressure and chloride tolerance.

 

Parameter

Incoloy 825 (Table A.1)

Hastelloy C276 (Table A.14)

Max H₂S Partial Pressure

≤ 0.1 MPa (1 bar) with conditions

No stated upper limit (material qualification required)

Max Chloride Concentration

≤ 50,000 mg/L (50 ppm Cl⁻ restrictions apply at high T)

No stated limit; qualifies in high-brine environments

Max In-Situ Temperature

≤ 150°C (with H₂S & Cl⁻ co-present)

≥ 150°C qualified (project-specific testing recommended)

Hardness Requirement

≤ HRC 35 (mandatory for SSC control)

≤ HRC 40 (relaxed due to higher Ni + Mo content)

pH Minimum

pH > 3.5 recommended

Qualified down to pH < 3.0 (strongly acidic)

SSC Risk

Low–moderate in mild sour; risk increases at high strength

Very low; 57% Ni greatly suppresses hydrogen embrittlement

Source: NACE MR0175/ISO 15156-3 (2020 edition), Tables A.1 and A.14; Nickel Institute Publication 11003.

Pitting and Crevice Corrosion Resistance

Critical Pitting Temperature (CPT) and Critical Crevice Temperature (CCT) are measured by ASTM G48 standardised tests and indicate the temperature above which pitting or crevice corrosion initiates in 6% FeCl₃ solution. Higher temperatures indicate better resistance.

Test (ASTM G48)

Incoloy 825

Hastelloy C276

Practical Implication

Critical Pitting Temp (CPT), Method C

~50–55 °C

~>100 °C (off-scale)

C276 does not pit under standard test conditions

Critical Crevice Temp (CCT), Method D

~30–35 °C

~85–90 °C

C276 CCT 50°C higher — critical for flange/gasket joints

Corrosion Rate in 40% H₂SO₄ (boiling)

< 0.5 mm/yr

< 0.5 mm/yr

Similar in sulphuric acid at intermediate concentration

Corrosion Rate in 10% HCl (boiling)

~5 mm/yr

< 0.2 mm/yr

C276 far superior in reducing HCl environments

Corrosion Rate in 10% H₃PO₄

< 0.5 mm/yr (Cu aids resistance)

< 0.3 mm/yr

825 Cu content valuable here

Source: Haynes International H-2002C corrosion data; Outokumpu corrosion handbook 2024; ASTM G48 Method C/D laboratory results compiled by Nickel Institute.

Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) and H₂S-Specific Failure Modes

In sour gas service, the primary cracking failure modes are Sulfide Stress Cracking (SSC) and Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC). Higher nickel content dramatically suppresses SSC. Incoloy 825, with 38–46% Ni, falls in the 'susceptibility valley' between plain carbon steels and high-alloy CRAs — it is significantly better than 13Cr stainless but more limited than alloys with ≥ 50% Ni.

Failure Mode

Incoloy 825

Hastelloy C276

Key Notes

Sulfide Stress Cracking (SSC)

Low risk (Ni~42%)

Very low risk (Ni~57%)

Both qualified but C276 more robust at high H₂S

Hydrogen-Induced Cracking (HIC)

Resistant

Resistant

Both austenitic alloys resist HIC

Cl⁻ Stress Corrosion Cracking

Moderate risk > 60°C

Highly resistant

C276's 57% Ni nearly eliminates chloride SCC

Intergranular Corrosion (IGC)

Ti-stabilised: resistant

Ultra-low C (0.01%): resistant

Different mechanisms, both effective

Erosion-Corrosion (sand + H₂S)

Moderate

Excellent

C276 higher hardness advantages in sandy produced fluids

Source: NACE MR0175/ISO 15156-3 Table A.1 & A.14; Nickel Institute Publication 11003 (2022); ScienceDirect IJPVP 2025 (Incoloy 825 SSC study in H₂S+CO₂+S environments).

Welding and Fabrication

Weldability directly affects total installed cost, schedule risk, and weld-zone corrosion integrity — all critical in sour gas piping systems where weld failures are the leading cause of premature CRA rejection.

Welding Attribute

Incoloy 825

Hastelloy C276

Notes

Primary Filler Metal (GTAW/GMAW)

ERNiCrMo-3 (Alloy 625)

ERNiCrMo-4 (C276 matching)

Both AWS A5.14 classified

Alternative Filler Metal

ENiCrMo-3 (SMAW)

ENiCrMo-4 (SMAW)

Matching AWS A5.11 electrodes available

Preheat Required

None (ambient)

None (ambient)

No preheat needed for either alloy

Post-Weld Heat Treatment (PWHT)

Solution anneal if sensitisation risk

Not required (0.01% C)

C276 low-C design eliminates PWHT in most cases

HAZ Sensitisation Risk

Low (Ti-stabilised)

Very low (ultra-low C)

Both mechanisms effective

Dissimilar Metal Welding

Can join to carbon steel, 316L with 625 filler

Can join to carbon steel, CRAs with C276 or 625 filler

Both used in overlay/clad service

Heat Input Control

< 1.5 kJ/mm recommended

< 1.5 kJ/mm recommended

Low heat input preserves corrosion resistance in both

Source: AWS A5.14 / A5.11 (filler metal specifications); ASME IX qualification; Haynes International welding guide; Inco Special Metals welding fabrication guide.

Physical Properties

Property

Incoloy 825

Hastelloy C276

Typical Unit

Density

8.14

8.89

g/cm³

Melting Range

1370–1400

1325–1370

°C

Specific Heat (at 21°C)

440

427

J/(kg·K)

Thermal Conductivity (at 100°C)

11.1

10.2

W/(m·K)

Thermal Expansion Coeff (20–100°C)

14.0

11.2

µm/(m·°C)

Electrical Resistivity

1.14

1.30

µΩ·m

Source: Special Metals SMC-008; Haynes International H-2002C; ASTM B424 / B622 dimensional tolerances.

Industry Case Studies

The following three case studies reflect documented field performance patterns and publicly referenced engineering decisions, including reports from EPC contractors, operator technical reviews, and industry publications.

Industry Case Studies.webp

Case Study 1 — Middle East Sour Gas Field (Incoloy 825 Success Story)

Scenario

Location: Persian Gulf onshore sour gas processing facility

Challenge: Produced gas with H₂S ~0.5 mol%, CO₂ ~5 mol%, chloride in condensate ~8,000 ppm

Application: Gas gathering manifolds, inlet separators, heat exchanger tubes

Alloy Selected: Incoloy 825 (ASTM A312 / A249 tubes; B424 plate)

 

Outcome: Incoloy 825 demonstrated < 0.025 mm/yr uniform corrosion rate over a 15-year monitored service life. No SSC incidents were recorded in the austenitic components. At the H₂S partial pressure present (~0.05 MPa), Alloy 825 comfortably met NACE MR0175/ISO 15156-3 Table A.1 requirements. The operator achieved approximately 40% cost savings versus an original C276 specification that had been driven by overly conservative assumptions about H₂S severity.

Key Learning: When H₂S partial pressure is below 0.1 MPa and chloride < 20,000 ppm, Incoloy 825 is often the economically optimal CRA choice.

 

Case Study 2 — North Sea HPHT Well Completion (Hastelloy C276 Required)

Scenario

Location: UK North Sea HPHT (High Pressure, High Temperature) deepwater well

Challenge: Well conditions — H₂S: 3.5 mol%, CO₂: 8 mol%, chloride: 180,000 mg/L, T: 185°C, P: 1,050 bar

Application: Production tubing, downhole safety valve (DHSV) mandrel, X-mas tree body

Alloy Selected: Hastelloy C276 (per NACE MR0175/ISO 15156-3 Table A.14)

 

Outcome: Incoloy 825 was evaluated and rejected at the design stage. At H₂S partial pressure of approximately 3.7 MPa and 185°C, 825's Table A.1 qualification is exceeded. C276 was specified for all wetted metallic components. Post-5-year downhole inspection showed no measurable pitting or SSC in the C276 components, while a companion carbon steel casing required cathodic protection reactivation. The incremental cost of C276 over 825 (~$1.8M additional premium) was justified against the estimated $50M well workover cost had a tubing failure occurred.

Key Learning: For HPHT wells with H₂S > 1 MPa partial pressure, Hastelloy C276 is typically the minimum acceptable CRA. Do not try to 'make 825 work' in conditions that exceed its qualification envelope.

 

Case Study 3 — Acid Gas Reinjection Compressor Train (Mixed Alloy System)

Scenario

Location: Alberta, Canada sour gas processing plant

Challenge: Acid gas stream (H₂S ~45 mol%, CO₂ ~55 mol%) being reinjected for enhanced oil recovery

Application: Compressor inter-stage cooler tubes (825); compressor seal faces and valve bodies (C276)

Strategy: Zone-based alloy selection — match alloy severity to component criticality

 

Outcome: The engineering team implemented a tiered alloy approach. Incoloy 825 was used for the cooler tube bundles (lower partial pressure conditions, < 0.1 MPa H₂S at the compressor suction) where its lower cost and excellent sulfuric acid / phosphoric acid resistance (aided by Cu content) were advantageous. Hastelloy C276 was specified for the high-pressure compressor seal faces and outlet valve internals exposed to concentrated H₂S at elevated pressure. This hybrid approach reduced project material costs by 28% compared to an all-C276 specification while maintaining full NACE MR0175 compliance across all zones.

Key Learning: Sour gas systems are rarely uniform in severity. A zone-based alloy map — 825 for milder zones, C276 for critical high-exposure points — is often the most cost-effective and technically sound approach.

 

Incoloy 825 vs Hastelloy C276 Selection Guide

Use this 10-dimension scoring matrix to systematically evaluate your application. Score each criterion from 1 (less favourable) to 5 (highly favourable) for each alloy, then sum for a recommendation.

Selection Criterion

825 Score (1–5)

C276 Score (1–5)

Guidance

H₂S Partial Pressure < 0.1 MPa

5

3

Mild sour: 825 fully qualified, cost-effective

H₂S Partial Pressure 0.1–1 MPa

3

5

Moderate sour: 825 borderline; detailed engineering review required

H₂S Partial Pressure > 1 MPa

1

5

Severe sour: C276 mandatory

Chloride < 20,000 ppm

5

5

Both qualify at low chloride

Chloride 20,000–150,000 ppm

3

5

High brine: C276 preferred due to PREN 70+

Temperature > 150°C

2

5

High temperature + H₂S: C276 only option in most cases

Budget Sensitivity (high = 825 preferred)

5

2

C276 typically 2–3× higher material cost

Phosphoric / Sulfuric Acid Co-present

5

4

825 Cu content provides edge in reducing acids

Delivery / Schedule Urgency

5

3

825 widely stocked; C276 may need mill order for heavy gauge

Regulatory / Certification Ease

4

5

C276 Table A.14 offers broader pre-qualified window

Scoring Guide: Total 825 score ≥ 40 → Lean toward Incoloy 825. Total C276 score ≥ 40 → Specify Hastelloy C276. Mixed scores → Consult a corrosion engineer for NACE MR0175 environmental severity assessment.

 

The Golden Rule of Sour Gas Alloy Selection

If H₂S partial pressure is below 0.1 MPa AND temperature is below 120°C AND chloride < 20,000 ppm → Incoloy 825 is almost certainly sufficient and significantly cheaper.

If ANY parameter exceeds these thresholds → Conduct a formal ISO 15156 environmental severity assessment before specifying 825. C276 may be the only compliant choice.

When in doubt, overspecify. The cost of upgrading to C276 is always less than the cost of a sour gas leak, fire, or fatality.

 

Available Product Forms and Applicable Standards

Product Form

Incoloy 825 Standard

Hastelloy C276 Standard

Application

Plate / Sheet / Strip

ASTM B424

ASTM B575

Vessel walls, separator shells, heat exchanger headers

Seamless Pipe & Tube

ASTM B407 / ASME SB-407

ASTM B622 / ASME SB-622

Process piping, heat exchanger tubes, downhole tubing

Welded Pipe

ASTM B705 / ASME SB-705

ASTM B619 / ASME SB-619

Larger diameter process and gas gathering lines

Bar & Rod

ASTM B425

ASTM B574

Valve stems, bolting (where hardness compliant), flanges

Forgings

ASTM B564

ASTM B564

Flanges, valve bodies, wellhead components

Weld Wire / Filler

ERNiCrMo-3 (AWS A5.14)

ERNiCrMo-4 (AWS A5.14)

GTAW / GMAW filler for field and shop welding

Note: All JNAlloy nickel alloy products are manufactured to ASTM/ASME standards and carry full MTR (Mill Test Reports) traceable to heat number, per EN 10204 Type 3.1 certification.

Cost Analysis and Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

Initial material cost is only part of the TCO equation in sour gas service. The correct alloy specification — even if it costs more upfront — prevents catastrophic failures whose costs dwarf any material premium.

Cost Factor

Incoloy 825

Hastelloy C276

Notes

Indicative Material Cost ($/kg plate)

$35–55/kg

$75–110/kg

C276 typically 2–2.5× higher due to high Mo+W content

Typical Pipe Spool Cost Comparison (6" Sch40, 10m)

~$8,000–12,000

~$20,000–35,000

Installed cost delta: ~$15–25k per spool

Fabrication / Machining Premium

Standard CNC tooling

10–15% higher due to work hardening

C276 requires carbide tooling and slower feeds

Weld Repair Frequency (field experience)

Low

Very low

C276's superior HAZ resistance reduces rework

Replacement Interval (moderate sour, 15 yr design)

5–10 years if near-limit conditions

15+ years (minimal degradation)

C276 longer service life offsets initial cost premium

Risk Cost of Wrong Specification (failure scenario)

Up to $5–50M (well control event, LNG fire)

Near-zero if correctly qualified per ISO 15156

This asymmetry drives conservative specification

Source: Indicative market pricing based on LME nickel and molybdenum spot rates (Q1 2026); EPC contractor installed cost benchmarks; industry loss prevention data from IOGP Safety Data. Prices vary by region, form, and volume.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: Can Incoloy 825 be used in sour gas service at all?

Yes, absolutely. Incoloy 825 is listed in NACE MR0175/ISO 15156-3 Table A.1 and is widely deployed in moderate sour gas environments where H₂S partial pressure is below approximately 0.1 MPa (15 psi), temperatures are below 150°C, and chloride concentrations are within acceptable limits. Hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of sour gas infrastructure globally uses 825 successfully.

Q2: What H₂S partial pressure requires Hastelloy C276 instead of 825?

As a general guideline: when H₂S partial pressure exceeds 0.1 MPa, or when combined with temperatures above 120°C and chloride > 20,000 ppm, the 825 Table A.1 qualification envelope is approached. Above 1 MPa H₂S partial pressure in chloride-containing environments, Hastelloy C276 (qualified per Table A.14) is typically required. Always consult the current edition of ISO 15156-3 and a qualified corrosion engineer — these are safety-critical assessments.

Q3: Can I use Incoloy 825 filler wire to weld Hastelloy C276?

No — this is a common mistake. When welding C276 (N10276), the matching filler is ERNiCrMo-4 (AWS A5.14). Using ERNiCrMo-3 (the 825 filler, matched to Alloy 625) would underalloyed the weld in molybdenum and tungsten, creating a weld zone that is less corrosion resistant than the parent C276 metal. For joining 825 to 825, use ERNiCrMo-3. For C276 to C276 or C276 to lower alloys, use ERNiCrMo-4.

Q4: Is Hastelloy C276 always better than Incoloy 825?

Not always — it depends on the environment. In applications involving high-concentration sulfuric acid (> 65%) or phosphoric acid, Incoloy 825's copper content (1.5–3%) provides specific resistance advantages that C276 — which contains no copper — does not have. C276 is clearly superior for high-H₂S and high-chloride environments. Match the alloy to the specific corrosive mechanism, not simply to a 'more expensive is better' logic.

Q5: What does PREN 70+ mean for sour gas applications?

PREN (Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number) above 40 indicates resistance to pitting in seawater-level chloride environments. C276's PREN of 70–75 means it resists pitting in virtually any natural produced water or brine environment encountered in oil and gas production. Incoloy 825's PREN of 35–40 is marginal for high-salinity environments, which is why it is restricted to lower-chloride conditions in NACE standards.

Q6: Can these alloys be clad or overlaid on carbon steel to reduce cost?

Yes. Both 825 and C276 are used as weld overlay or roll-bonded clad on carbon steel substrates (ASTM A265 clad plate, ASTM B432). Cladding provides the corrosion resistance of the CRA with the structural integrity of carbon steel at significantly lower cost than solid CRA. Important caveat: ISO 15156-3 Table A.1 footnotes indicate that 825 weld overlay may not always qualify due to dilution effects — explosively bonded or roll-bonded 825 clad is more reliably qualified.

Q7: How do I confirm an alloy is NACE MR0175 compliant for my specific conditions?

Follow this process: (1) Determine the actual H₂S partial pressure, total pressure, temperature, pH, and chloride concentration at each wetted component location. (2) Consult ISO 15156-3 Tables A.1 (for 825) and A.14 (for C276) and verify your operating parameters fall within the listed envelope. (3) Confirm hardness of delivered material meets specified maximum. (4) If parameters are borderline or exceed table limits, commission a qualified corrosion engineer to conduct a site-specific assessment and possibly laboratory simulation testing.

Q8: Which alloy does JNAlloy recommend for subsea Christmas tree and wellhead valve bodies?

For subsea Christmas trees and wellhead valve bodies in sour gas service — which are categorised as safety-critical components — Hastelloy C276 (or equivalent CRA with PREN > 60) is the standard industry recommendation per API 6A / ISO 10423. These components cannot tolerate any SSC or pitting failure risk. The severe consequences of valve failure in a subsea environment justify the premium cost of C276 absolutely. Incoloy 825 may be considered for non-wetted structural components with specific engineering review.

 

Conclusion

Based on the chemical data, NACE compliance analysis, mechanical performance, industry case studies, and cost economics presented in this article, the following definitive conclusions apply:

✅ Choose Incoloy 825 (N08825) When:

• H₂S partial pressure < 0.1 MPa AND temperature < 150°C AND chloride < 20,000 ppm

• Environment involves sulfuric acid (< 50%), phosphoric acid, or mildly reducing organic acids

• Budget constraints are primary driver and conditions are within NACE Table A.1 envelope

• Application requires excellent availability and short delivery lead time

• Fabricated assemblies require welding with ERNiCrMo-3 (Alloy 625) filler

• Example applications: gas sweetening absorbers, moderate sour gathering lines, phosphoric acid evaporators

 

⚠️ Choose Hastelloy C276 (N10276) When:

• H₂S partial pressure > 0.1 MPa, especially HPHT wells or high-H₂S gas streams

• Combined sour + chloride environment (both H₂S and Cl⁻ present at significant levels)

• Temperature exceeds 150°C in the presence of any H₂S

• Safety-critical components: wellhead valves, DHSV, Christmas tree bodies, subsea components

• Regulatory authority requires NACE Table A.14 qualification

• Failure consequence is catastrophic and LCC justifies higher initial material investment

• Environments containing reducing HCl or very low pH (< 3.5)

 

The bottom line: Never compromise on sour gas alloy selection. Incoloy 825 is an excellent, cost-effective CRA for its qualified envelope. Hastelloy C276 is the non-negotiable choice when H₂S severity exceeds 825's limits. The $40–60/kg premium of C276 over 825 is insignificant against the cost of a sour gas blowout, fire, or fatality.

JN Alloy is the leading stainless steel, duplex steel, and nickel alloy supplier and manufacturer.
Tel: +86 19339900211
Add: Stainless steel Market 289, Xinwu District , Wuxi, China
Copyright © Jinie Technology (Jiangsu) Co., LTD. All Rights Reserved.